Impact of new-onset and preexisting neurological disorders in COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is still considered a global pandemic. The prognosis of COVID-19 patients varies greatly. We aimed to assess the impact of preexisting, chronic neurological diseases (CNDs) and new-onset acute neurological complications (ANCs) on the disease course, its complications, and outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a monocentric retrospective analysis from all hospitalized COVID-19 patients between May 1, 2020 and January 31, 2021. Employing multivariable logistic regression models, we explored the association of CNDs and ANCs separately with hospital mortality and functional outcome. RESULTS: A total of 250 among 709 patients with COVID-19 had CNDs. We found a 2.0 times higher chance of death (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.37-2.92) for CND patients than for non-CND patients. The chance for an unfavorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale > 3 at discharge) was 1.67 times higher in patients with CNDs than those without (95% CI: 1.07-2.59). Furthermore, 117 of all patients had 135 ANCs in total. We observed a 1.86 times higher chance to die (95% CI: 1.18-2.93) for patients with ANCs than without. The chance for a worse functional outcome was 3.6-fold higher in ANC patients than without (95% CI: 2.22-6.01). Patients with CNDs had 1.73 times higher odds for developing ANCs (95% CI: 0.97-3.08). CONCLUSION: Preexisting neurologic disorders or ANCs in COVID-19 patients were associated with higher mortality and poorer functional outcome at discharge. Furthermore, development of acute neurologic complications was more frequent in patients with preexisting neurologic disease. Early neurological evaluation appears to be an important prognostic factor in COVID-19 patients.

Surgical Timing in Patients With Infective Endocarditis and With Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is one of the main causes for lack of surgery in patients with infective endocarditis (IE), despite the presence of surgical indications. We aimed to evaluate the impact of early surgery in patients with IE and with ICH on postoperative neurological deterioration and all-cause mortality and to elucidate the risk of 30-day mortality in patients who were denied surgery. Methods and Results Three libraries (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) were assessed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was neurological deterioration. Inverse variance method and random model were performed. We identified 16 studies including 355 patients. Nine studies examined the impact of surgical timing (early versus late) and were included in the meta-analysis. Only one study examined the fate of patients with IE and with ICH who were treated conservatively despite having an indication for cardiac surgery, showing higher mortality rates than those who underwent surgery (11.8% versus 2.5%). We found no significant association between early surgery, regardless of its definition, and a higher mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.69; 95% CI, 0.95-3.02). Early surgery was associated with higher risk for neurological deterioration (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.10-3.65). Conclusions Cardiac surgery for IE within 30 days of ICH was not associated with higher mortality, but with an increased rate of neurological deterioration. The 30-day mortality in patients with IE and with ICH who were denied surgery has not yet been sufficiently investigated. This patient group should be analyzed in future studies in more detail.

COVID-19 and Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Multicenter Case Series, Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) profoundly impacts hemostasis and microvasculature. In the light of the dilemma between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, in the present paper, we systematically investigate the prevalence, mortality, radiological subtypes, and clinical characteristics of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we performed a systematic review of the literature by screening the PubMed database and included patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and concomitant ICH. We performed a pooled analysis, including a prospectively collected cohort of critically ill COVID-19 patients with ICH, as part of the PANDEMIC registry (Pooled Analysis of Neurologic Disorders Manifesting in Intensive Care of COVID-19). RESULTS: Our literature review revealed a total of 217 citations. After the selection process, 79 studies and a total of 477 patients were included. The median age was 58.8 years. A total of 23.3% of patients experienced the critical stage of COVID-19, 62.7% of patients were on anticoagulation and 27.5% of the patients received ECMO. The prevalence of ICH was at 0.85% and the mortality at 52.18%, respectively. CONCLUSION: ICH in COVID-19 patients is rare, but it has a very poor prognosis. Different subtypes of ICH seen in COVID-19, support the assumption of heterogeneous and multifaceted pathomechanisms contributing to ICH in COVID-19. Further clinical and pathophysiological investigations are warranted to resolve the conflict between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in the future.

Impact of an In-Hospital Endocarditis Team and a State-Wide Endocarditis Network on Perioperative Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) requires multidisciplinary management. We established an endocarditis team within our hospital in 2011 and a state-wide endocarditis network with referring hospitals in 2015. We aimed to investigate their impact on perioperative outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients operated on for IE in our center between 01/2007 and 03/2018. To investigate the impact of the endocarditis network on referral latency and pre-operative complications we divided patients into two eras: before (n = 409) and after (n = 221) 01/2015. To investigate the impact of the endocarditis team on post-operative outcomes we conducted multivariate binary logistic regression analyses for the whole population. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-year survival were reported. RESULTS: In the second era, after establishing the endocarditis network, the median time from symptoms to referral was halved (7 days (interquartile range: 2-19) vs. 15 days (interquartile range: 6-35)), and pre-operative endocarditis-related complications were reduced, i.e., stroke (14% vs. 27%, p < 0.001), heart failure (45% vs. 69%, p < 0.001), cardiac abscesses (24% vs. 34%, p = 0.018), and acute requirement of hemodialysis (8% vs. 14%, p = 0.026). In both eras, a lack of recommendations from the endocarditis team was an independent predictor for in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.27-3.53, p = 0.004) and post-operative stroke (adjusted odds ratio: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.12-4.39, p = 0.02), and was associated with worse 5-year survival (59% vs. 40%, log-rank < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The establishment of an endocarditis network led to the earlier referral of patients with fewer pre-operative endocarditis-related complications. Adhering to endocarditis team recommendations was an independent predictor for lower post-operative stroke and in-hospital mortality, and was associated with better 5-year survival.

Risk of postoperative neurological exacerbation in patients with infective endocarditis and intracranial haemorrhage.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiac surgery in patients with infective endocarditis (IE) and preoperative intracranial haemorrhage (pre-ICH) is a highly debatable issue, and guidelines are still not well defined. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of cardiac surgery and its timing on the clinical outcomes of patients with IE and pre-ICH. METHODS: We did a single-centre retrospective analysis of data from patients with preoperative brain imaging who had surgery for left-sided IE between January 2007 and May 2018. RESULTS: Among the 363 patients included in the study, 34 had pre-ICH. Hospital mortality was similar between the patients with and without pre-ICH (29% vs 27%, respectively; P = 0.84). Unadjusted, postoperative neurological deterioration appeared higher in patients with pre-ICH (24% vs 17%; P = 0.35). In multivariable analysis, pre-ICH did not qualify as an independent predictor for either postoperative neurological deterioration [odds ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-2.73; P = 0.84] or hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.43-2.40; P = 0.96). Postoperative partial thromboplastin time was significantly elevated in 4 patients with relevant post-ICH compared with those patients without relevant post-ICH (65.5 vs 37.6, respectively; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-ICH was not an independent predictor for postoperative neurological deterioration or hospital mortality in patients with IE. Postoperative coagulation management seems to be crucial in patients with IE with ICH. Although this is to date the largest monocentric study addressing surgical decision and timing, the number of patients with pre-ICH was low. Therefore, these conclusions should be regarded with caution; randomized clinical trials are needed.